Our Tumwater office moved. Visit us at our new location.
Nuestra oficina en Tumwater se ha mudado. Visítenos en nuestra nueva ubicación.
Our Tumwater office moved. Visit us at our new location.
Nuestra oficina en Tumwater se ha mudado. Visítenos en nuestra nueva ubicación.
September 17, 2025
Effective October 1, 2025, Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5814, Laws of 2025, Chapter 422 (ESSB 5814) makes the sale of advertising services a retail sale subject to Washington’s retailing business and occupation (B&O) tax and retail sales tax. The purpose of this interim guidance statement is to provide guidance that taxpayers can rely on while the Department of Revenue (department) creates permanent guidance.
This interim guidance is divided into the following sections:
Examples found in this interim guidance statement identify a number of facts and then state a conclusion. These examples should be used only as a general guide. The tax results of other situations must be determined after a review of all facts and circumstances.
Under ESSB 5814, effective October 1, 2025, the sale of advertising services will be treated as a “retail sale.”[1] Accordingly, advertising services will be subject to retailing B&O tax and retail sales tax if offered other than for resale.[2]
ESSB 5814 defines “advertising services” to mean:
The sale of advertising services is a retail sale. Retail sales must be sourced in accordance with RCW 82.32.730 for sales and use tax and retailing B&O tax purposes. The term “source," "sourced," or "sourcing" refer to the location (as in a state, local taxing district, jurisdiction, or authority) where a sale is deemed to occur.
Advertising services are subject to tax based on the location where the services are received by the purchaser and other default sourcing rules as follows:[3]
As part of the department’s efforts to gather feedback from industry members, there was a request to provide information related to the sourcing of creative advertising services such as graphic design, layout, and similar activities that occur prior to dissemination (referred to in this interim guidance as “creative” or “pre-dissemination” services) and advertising services that involve the actual dissemination (i.e., the release or distribution) of the advertising (referred to in this interim guidance as “dissemination” services). In response to this request, this interim guidance addresses both types of advertising services.
Retailers must generally collect and remit retail sales tax when payment for services are made. Industry feedback indicates that there are a number of business models in the advertising space. This means that in some models sellers and/or purchasers of advertising services will know the location where the advertising services are used at the time payment is made, while in other models, sellers and/or purchasers of advertising services will only know the location where the advertising services are used after payment for the services is made. Also, it is possible that in some models, sellers and/or purchasers of advertising services may never have information on the location where the advertising services are used. Finally, the department recognizes that some industries and/or advertisers may have specific privacy rules to comply with, and in such cases the taxpayer is encouraged to contact that department for a binding ruling.
“Receipt,” in relevant part, generally means to make first use of the service.[4] While not binding on the department, the department may be guided by the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement (SSUTA) when determining the location of receipt.[5] The SSUTA does not directly address the sourcing of advertising services, but does address the sourcing of services generally, indicating “the location (or locations) where the purchaser (or the purchaser’s donee) can potentially first make use of the result of the service is the location (or locations) of the ‘receipt’ of the service.”[6] In determining the location of receipt for advertising services, the department provides the following guidance:
Facts: ADco, a Washington-based company, sells retail taxable advertising services to Purchaser A, which sells pizza, for its pizza business. Purchaser A contracts to have advertising disseminated exclusively in Tacoma based on two nine-digit zip codes also known as directional advertising. The contract price is $2,000.
Result: Purchaser A receives the advertising services at the location of dissemination, which is in Tacoma, Washington. The location of receipt is known to ADco. The entire $2,000 selling price may be sourced to the two nine-digit zip code locations based on amount of advertising used in those zip codes. If the precise amount allocable to the nine-digit zip codes is unknown, ADco may allocate the sales between the zip codes proportionally if it is able to reasonably estimate the amount of advertising in each nine-digit zip code or may allocate equally between the zip codes if the proportion is unknown.
Facts: Assume the same facts as Example 1, except the advertising is disseminated state-wide, but without specific zip codes selected.
Result: Same result as Example 1, except ADco may also use the applicable state-wide pool code.
Facts: Assume the same facts as Example 1, except that the seller bills the advertising services after the services are performed. Payment to ADco is based on the number of viewer impressions for the advertising services. ADco is paid $1 per impression. For the December billing, there are 1,000 impressions associated with a Tacoma, Washington nine-digit zip code number and 1,000 impressions associated with a second nine-digit zip code in Tacoma, Washington. There are an additional 100 impressions that have no specific zip code associated with them, but these impressions are associated with Washington. The gross amount billed for December is $2,100.
Result: ADco should pay the retailing B&O tax and collect retail sales tax on the gross amount of $2,100. ADco should source the portion of the transaction related to the two Tacoma nine-digit zip codes to Tacoma and collect the applicable rate for Tacoma. ADco may source the transaction related to the additional 100 impressions with no specifically associated zip code to the applicable state-wide pool code, collecting the applicable rate for that pool code.
Facts: ADco2, a Washington-based company, sells retail taxable advertising services to Purchaser B for its electronics business. Purchaser B contracts to have advertising disseminated exclusively within Washington. However, ADco2 does not know the location or locations where the advertising will be disseminated at the time Purchaser B pays the contract price and when sales tax must be collected. The contract price is $2,000. Purchaser B has two business locations, one location in Washington and one location in Oregon.
Result: Because the location of use is unknown, ADco2 would source the transaction to the purchaser’s Washington location. Because the advertising is to be disseminated only to Washington, use of the Oregon location would be deemed bad faith.
Facts: ADco3, a Washington-based company, sells retail taxable advertising services to Purchaser C for its IT business. Purchaser C contracts to have the advertising disseminated as part of a multistate advertising campaign. Purchaser C pays the contract price of $1 million before any advertising is disseminated. ADco3 does not know where the advertising will be disseminated at the time advertising services are invoiced and billed. ADco3 will not know the locations of use until potential customers enter certain keywords in their browsers and are served related advertising.
Result: Purchaser C receives the advertising services where the advertising is disseminated. ADco3 must report the sale under the retailing B&O tax classification and must collect and remit retail sales tax based on where Purchaser C received the service, if known. ADco3 will source the sale as follows:
Facts: Same facts as Example 5, but ADco3 instead invoices and bills Purchaser C after the advertising services have been served to potential customers. ADco3 invoices Purchaser B $100,000 for advertising services served to Washington IP addresses.
Result: The $100,000 relating to advertising is received by Purchaser C in Washington based on the IP address locations. If ADco3 is able to match the IP address or other information to a location code using the appropriate look up application using street address, zip code, or GIS map location, ADco should use the application to determine the correct local jurisdiction(s) to source the sale. If ADco is unable to match the IP address to a location code, it may use the applicable pool code instead. ADco must report the sale under the retailing B&O tax classification and must collect and remit retail sales tax based on where Purchaser C received the service.
Facts: ADco4, a Washington-based company, contracts to advise Purchaser D concerning the best methods of advertising Purchaser D’s products for $2,000. The scope of the contract is solely for ADco4 to advise on Purchaser D’s products. The contract requires ADco4 to advise Purchaser D’s marketing office, which is located in Seattle, Washington. There is no identifiable location where the pre-dissemination advertising services will be disseminated or if the dissemination will even occur.
Result: This is a retail taxable advertising service. Purchaser D receives the advertising service at the Seattle, Washington location, and ADco4 must collect and remit sales tax based on this location. ADco4 must also report the sale under the retailing B&O tax classification.
Facts: ADco5, a Washington-based company, contracts to create and advise Purchaser E on its new advertising campaign and to then disseminate the associated advertising for $50,000. The contract requires ADco5 to work with Purchaser E’s marketing office in Walla Walla, Washington for the campaign. The advertising is disseminated to locations wholly within 20 known nine-digit zip codes within Washington or Oregon.
Result: This is a retail taxable advertising service. The $50,000 selling price may be sourced to the 20 known nine-digit zip code locations based on the amount of advertising used in those zip codes. If the precise amount allocable to each nine-digit zip codes is unknown, ADco5 may allocate the sales between the known nine-digit zip codes equally. ADco5 must collect and remit sales tax and report retailing B&O tax for the sales allocated to locations within Washington.
Retail taxable advertising services do not include:
Facts: ADco6, a Washington-based company, sells advertising to Purchaser F for its Washington-based real estate business. Purchaser F contracts to have the advertising placed on Spokane bus benches and signage on specific billboards for $3,000.
Result: These are not retail taxable advertising services as these services are for out-of-home advertising that are excluded from the definition of advertising services. This is not a retail sale and is not subject to retail sales tax. Therefore, sourcing under RCW 82.32.730 is not applicable. Instead, ADco6’s $3,000 gross income from this service is subject to tax under the service and other activities B&O tax classification. Please reference WAC 458-20-19402 for more information on apportionment and when income from transactions subject to the service and other activities B&O tax classification is attributed to Washington.
Facts: BroadcastCo, a television broadcaster licensed and regulated and issued a call sign by the federal communications commission (FCC) sells advertising airtime on its station to Purchaser G. Purchaser G contracts to have advertisements placed on BroadcastCo’s specific television programming for $100,000.
Result: These are not retail taxable advertising services as these services are rendered in respect to radio and television broadcasting that are excluded from retail advertising services. For information on taxability of radio and television broadcasters’ income, see RCW 82.04.281.
Facts: PublishCo, a Washington-based company, prints and publishes both a physical print magazine and a substantially equivalent digital version. PublishCo contracts with Purchaser H, a Washington-based company, to print specific advertisements in the digital version of PublishCo’s magazine for $5,000, and additional advertisements on PublishCo’s website outside the context of the digital version of the magazine for $2,000.
Result: With respect to the $5,000 charge for advertising on the digital version of PublishCo’s magazine, PublishCo’s sale to Purchaser H is not retail taxable advertising services as these services are rendered in respect to printing and publishing that is taxable under RCW 82.04.280 and excluded from retail advertising services. For more information on the taxability of printing and publishing, including advertising information, see WAC 458-20-143.[10]
With respect to the $2,000 charge for advertising on PublishCo’s website, the charge is a retail taxable advertising service and not excluded. PublishCo must report this amount under the retailing B&O tax classification and must collect and remit sales tax on this amount as indicated in this interim guidance.
Facts: GroceryCo operates a chain of grocery stores located in Washington. GroceryCo contracts with Purchaser I to advertise Purchaser I’s products in print advertisements provided to customers at GroceryCo’s store and also separately mailed to customers, internet advertisements, in-store display advertising, and point of sale advertising for a single charge of $1,000.
Result: GroceryCo’s sale of in-store or print advertisements will generally be excluded from retail advertising services because they are services rendered in respect to out-of-home advertising. However, advertising that is provided by GroceryCo on the internet or printed mailings does not qualify for the exclusion from advertising services and would be subject to the retailing B&O and retail sales tax. If all of the services are provided for one non-itemized price, the sale may be a bundled transaction. See RCW 82.08.190 and 82.08.195.
It may be unclear at the time the contract is executed how a service may be used by the purchaser. For tax reporting purposes, taxpayers should classify the service based on the information available at the time the contract is executed. Unless the taxpayer provides documentation that such service is not an advertising service, the department may presume the service is a retail taxable advertising service. If a purchaser later uses the service in a different manner, it may be necessary for the seller to reclassify the service to a different tax classification. This may also subject the purchaser to sales or use tax. Likewise, reclassifying the transaction from a retail sale to another tax classification may entitle the purchaser to obtain a refund of sales tax paid. Please see the department’s interim guidance statement regarding contracts existing prior to October 1, 2025 and changes made by ESSB 5814 for more information.
Facts: In December 2025, ADco10, a Washington-based company, enters into a contract to design and disseminate a series of advertisements for Purchaser J, based in Spokane, Washington. At the time the contract was executed, ADco10 and Purchaser J expected the services to be used for advertising on various websites. As such, ADco10 collected retail sales tax and reported its income for retailing B&O tax. However, after further market research, Purchaser J ultimately decides that they want the advertisements to instead be placed in an electronic newspaper.
Result: Because the services were actually rendered in respect to newspapers, the sale is excluded from retail advertising services. Purchaser J may be entitled to a refund of the sales tax paid. ADco10 may file an amended return to reclassify the gross income received from the sale from retailing B&O tax classification to the service & other activities classification if the gross income (or portion thereof) is properly apportioned to Washington (see WAC 458-20-19402).
RCW 82.08.0208(4) provides the multiple points of use (MPU) retail sales exemption for certain eligible products, including digital products, such as digital automated services (DAS), used by the purchaser concurrently inside and outside of Washington. RCW 82.12.0208(7) works in conjunction with the MPU sales tax exemption to apply use tax proportionately to the use of these products in Washington. This means that instead of paying retail sales tax at the time of purchase, buyers claiming the MPU exemption must apportion and report use tax directly to the department.
If a service that is defined as a retail sale under RCW 82.04.050 also meets the definition of a DAS, the department will treat these services as digital products that are eligible for all applicable retail sale and use tax exemptions, including the MPU exemption. A DAS is “any service transferred electronically that uses one or more software applications.” See WAC 458-20-15503(601). The question of whether a service meets the definition of a DAS generally depends on the facts and circumstances of that service. At the time of this IGS, the department has received no feedback concerning whether any advertising services may meet the definition of a DAS. Sellers and their customers will need to make this determination as to whether their service is a DAS.
When the purchaser receives retail services that are also DAS concurrently inside and outside of Washington, the purchaser will generally be eligible to use the multiple points of use sales tax exemption and pay use tax on the amount apportioned to Washington under RCW 82.12.0208. Notably, if the advertisement is disseminated to locations inside and outside of Washington through a server(s), the department will presume there is concurrent use.
Generally, retail services are received by the purchaser at the locations where the service is provided and will be used concurrently at those locations. Because the purchaser is the user of the retail service, and may use the services remotely, the department will require an alternative method of apportionment under RCW 82.12.0208(7), supported by the taxpayer’s records, that fairly reflects the proportion of advertising services used in Washington and outside the state.
For advertising services specifically:
However, if the DAS is sold as part of a bundled transaction, then the MPU exemption and related apportionment is not available.[11] A bundled transaction is the sale of two or more distinct and identifiable products sold for one nonitemized priced.[12] Pursuant to this interim guidance, the department will accept there is not a bundled transaction and the packaged products can each be taxed according to their appropriate classification if:
Facts: ADco10, a Washington-based company, sells retail taxable advertising services to Purchaser K for its IT business. Purchaser K has multiple locations in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, but is headquartered in Seattle, Washington. Purchaser K contracts to have the advertising disseminated as part of a multistate digital advertising campaign. ADco10’s service to disseminate the ads meets the definition of a DAS. Purchaser K pays the contract price of $1 million before any advertising is disseminated. ADco10 does not know where the advertising will be disseminated until potential customers enter certain keywords into their browsers and are served the advertising. At the time of sale, Purchaser K provides ADco10 with a multiple points of use exemption certificate.
Result: ADco10 is selling retail advertising services that also qualify as DAS. For purposes of ADco10’s retailing B&O tax, the advertising services are received by Purchaser K where the advertising is disseminated in the same manner as Example 5. ADco10 must report as follows:
Because the advertising services also qualify as DAS, Purchaser K is responsible for use tax and must use a method of apportionment supported by its books and records that fairly reflects the proportion of advertising services disseminated in Washington. In the case of advertising services, use tax should generally be apportioned based on the location of persons viewing or interacting with the advertisements.
A purchaser of advertising services may use a direct pay permit to directly pay the retail sales tax on its purchase of advertising services, if all eligibility requirements are met and the department approves the purchaser’s application.
Under the direct pay program, approved businesses may purchase products without payment of sales tax to the seller at the time of purchase. Instead, the purchaser provides a direct pay permit to the seller and pays the sales and use taxes due directly to the department. To qualify for a direct pay permit, a seller needs to reasonably expect to have a cumulative tax liability of at least $240,000 in the current calendar year or make taxable purchases exceeding $10 million per calendar year.
Yes, in certain circumstances. Sellers of these services may use a reseller permit when subcontracting with a third-party service subcontractor in certain situations. However, providers must maintain documentation to substantiate that the services qualify for resale.
The seller of advertising services may provide a reseller permit to a third-party subcontractor to document that the seller is purchasing the third-party subcontractor ‘s services for resale purposes when both of the following factors are met:
Businesses providing wholesale advertising services may also accept other approved exemption certificates from their customers. See WAC 458-20-102. To be valid, paper certificates must be fully completed and signed by the customer.
If a seller of advertising services provides a subcontractor with a reseller permit or other approved exemption certificate, the seller does not need to pay retail sales tax. However, the subcontractor would still need to report the sale under the wholesaling B&O tax classification.
In Washington, nonprofit organizations are generally taxed like any other business. They must pay B&O tax and collect and remit sales tax on gross revenues generated from the regular business activities they conduct.[14] This means that nonprofit organizations must collect and remit retail sales tax when making retail sales of advertising services and must pay retail sales tax when purchasing advertising services. For more information, see our Nonprofit organizations industry guide.
In Washington, state and local governments are generally subject to retail sales tax on their purchases just like any other businesses.[15] Sellers must collect and remit retail sales tax on sales of advertising services to state or local governments.
The sale of advertising services when sold between members of an affiliated group are generally excluded from the definition of “retail sale” under ESSB 5814. Therefore, if the exclusion requirements are otherwise met, these services would be subject to the service and other activities B&O tax classification.
Washington’s B&O tax, including the retailing B&O tax, is calculated on the gross income from activities. This means that there are no deductions for labor, materials, taxes, or other costs of doing business. The B&O tax rate varies by classification, which you can find on the department’s business & occupation tax classifications webpage. For more information regarding B&O tax generally, please see the department’s business & occupation tax webpage.
Retail sales tax collection is based on the location where the customer receives the service (destination-based sales tax). The department has dedicated tools that help businesses track and determine the location code and sales tax rate to use. This includes a sales tax rate lookup URL Interface that provides direct access to the department’s address-based rate lookup technology platform.
Please see the department’s Sales & use tax rates and Sales and use tax tools webpages for more information
As required under RCW 82.32.070, sellers and purchasers of advertising services must keep and preserve suitable records to determine the amount of tax, including documentation necessary for sourcing sales, and documentation of any applicable exemptions or exclusions. Records that should be kept and preserved may include, but are not limited to: contracts and agreements, statements of work, orders/quotes, purchase orders, invoices, data used to determine where services and advertisements are targeted, viewed or otherwise used or received, exemption certificates or other documentation, and validation of any qualifying affiliate transactions.
The department will continue to review these issues for purposes of developing final guidance. This interim guidance statement will remain in effect until the department issues final guidance, cancels this interim statement, or new legislation is enacted.
Please see our Services newly subject to sales tax webpage for updates, guidance, and opportunities to engage with the department.
If you have questions about this guidance, please contact the department at DORrulings@dor.wa.gov.
[1] RCW 82.04.050.
[3] RCW 82.32.730(1); see also RCW 82.32.730(9)(f) (“‘Receive’ and ‘receipt’ mean taking possession of tangible personal property, making first use of digital automated services or other services, or taking possession or making first use of digital goods or digital codes, whichever comes first....”)
[7] See generally, SSUTA Rule 309.3, SSUTA Rule 311.1.
[9] Under RCW 82.04.281, "radio and television broadcasting" means delivery of audio, video, and written information by a person operating as a radio or television broadcasting station licensed, regulated, and issued a call sign by the federal communications commission including, but not limited to, delivery by wire, satellite, or any other means.
[10] For guidance on when publishing a digital periodical without a substantially equivalent tangible version is not an eligible printing and publishing activity, see Interim guidance statement regarding the application of the printing and publishing B&O tax classification to digital subscriptions of magazines and periodicals, and note that the exclusion only applies to activities that fall under the printing and publishing classification.
[11] ETA 3242.2025 does not extend to apply the MPU to other types of bundled transactions as it is only applicable for sales of software maintenance agreements.
[13] RCW 82.08.130(2) and WAC 458-20-10201(205).
[14] See WAC 458-20-169(4).
[15] See WAC 458-20-189(5).